Not Hip to be Foursquare

by Scarlett on March 15, 2010 · View Comments

in Popped Culture

I have to admit, with a mixture of sheepishness and “meh”, that when it comes to personal technology and social networking, I tend to be a few years behind the curve. I didn’t jump on the Facebook or Twitter bandwagons until 2009; I don’t own a smartphone and I’ve never used picture mail or the camera on my feeble little LG; I rock a 5 year old beast of an iPod that goes through batteries like it’s going out of style … Hell, I don’t even have a laptop or netbook to speak of – the ultimate sin of someone who professes to <3 technology. Still, there are times when I feel a sort of pride in being a little old school - most often when I start hearing troubling accounts of the newest iPhone app or weird web phenomenon (see my post about Chatroulette) gone awry. Amongst the fascinating labyrinth of articles in my busy Google Reader this weekend, there were a number of tidbits surrounding Foursquare, a web and mobile phone app introduced last year that now boasts over 450,000 members.

What’s the point of Foursquare? Glad you asked! It allows members to “check in” when they visit a new location throughout their day – be it a movie theater, a gas station, their place of employment, you name it. Users can then earn points and unlock badges for visiting certain locations – which, for some particularly competitive and boastful folks, is all the fodder that was needed to make the service a huge success. The sad part is that the lure of gaining a shiny, pixel-based and meaningless badge has overshadowed common sense to such a degree that a new trend has emerged – and a frightening one at that. Forget cyber stalking … In 2010, it’s all about Foursquare stalking.

avatar i see you Not Hip to be Foursquare
I see you … and I’m watching you.”

Here’s how Foursquare works to enable stalkers. By utilizing the GPS inside your phone, every time you arrive at a new location, the app asks you if you’d like to check in – and then broadcasts your location to your Foursquare friends. This alone might not be particularly worrying – after all, many of us have expressed to friends that we were going to the movies or taking a vacation. But more and more Foursquare users are opting to broadcast their check-ins to other social networking streams – and unless you have tightly protected and privatized Twitter and Facebook accounts, this practice could definitely spell bad news bears. To give an example, a creepy first-person account was posted at TwiTip about the dangers of publicly notifying your social networking kin that you’re not at home. This fella was working at a coffee shop when someone called on the cafe’s business line asking to speak with him, posing as a “concerned neighbor”, and claiming that his apartment was being robbed. The whole thing turned out to be a prank – or perhaps a pointed wake-up call at how easily this checking in business could be exploited.

Last month, a few Dutch developers took a more “in your face” approach and launched PleaseRobMe.com, which caught the attention of many of the major internet and social networking blogs. Mashable wrote about the site, which aggregates live Foursquare check-ins that have been posted to public Twitter streams. It’s eye-opening stuff, seeing how ignorant people about broadcasting their locations. For example, by clicking on one of the most recent check-in listings and scanning through the last page of her Twitter account, I found her full name and picture, a list of places she regularly hangs out, and her place of employment. I’m willing to bet she’s also on Facebook, and with a little crafty maneuvering I could probably get her to accept a friend request – at which point there’s no telling all the information I could collect about her. It sketches me out just thinking about it – but this guy actually tested the theory, and the results were alarming.

All of this leads me to wondering … Why use Foursquare to begin with? I only had a vague notion of what it was before I read those articles, and even with my scant knowledge of it, I thought it sounded pointless. I guess some people like the idea that they could check in somewhere, and maybe some nearby friends would drop in for an impromptu meet-up. But so could your ex-lover. So could one of your parents. So could that creepy dude from your Comp-Sci lab who’s been secretly pining over you for months.

Am I’m just being paranoid? Is there something about the positive aspects or purpose of Foursquare that I’m missing? Maybe its popularity is just a product of the changing landscape of internet transparency. Back in January, Mark Zuckerberg (the founder of Facebook), was interviewed about the sweeping privacy policy changes that were put into effect in December, which rendered ALL previously private account information to be completely public and searchable. Many users hastily rushed to rectify this upheaval in their settings, but thousands (perhaps millions) of others have been ignorant of the changes. He offered a vague explanation, saying that people are so used to sharing their information online, it’s become a “social norm”. I don’t know – I still think that people can maintain some semblance of privacy online, and more importantly, they should. Being over-exposed on the interwebs can lead to troublesome situations – and I don’t mean “exposed” in the smexy, amateur pornography manner. (Where can I sign up for a service that informs me when my friends are nekkid? That would RAWK!)

Do any of you use Foursquare? I’d love to hear your thoughts! Oh, and as I was writing this post, I peeped into my Twitter and a pop-up box asked me to turn on geo-location for my account. Jeezy Creezy, where does it end? I think I’mma go hibernate for a while.

igloo hibernation Not Hip to be Foursquare
I wonder if they have Wi-Fi?

{ 11 comments }

It’s always fascinating when new websites or apps begin to sweep the interwebs like a phenomenon (or in some cases, like a plague). I remember when Napster was bad ass, when Facebook swallowed the masses (and Farmville nearly achieved Class A drug status), when Twitter was no longer primarily populated with Ashton Kutcher fan-boys. And the latest web obsession to hit the mainstream is Chatroulette. Whether you equate the term with the casino game of luck, or the potentially lethal Russian variety, roulette is all about spinning the wheel (or the cylinder of a revolver) and taking a chance. In this case, you turn on your webcam, click to connect, and see what happens. And as you might expect, the results can be … eye-opening.

chatroulette screenshot 1 Wheel of Fortune     chatroulette screenshot 2 Wheel of Fortune

Personally, I’ve never experienced the awkward voyeurism of Chatroulette first-hand. (No, really!) I don’t have a webcam, and shoot – I don’t appear on camera unless I’m getting paid for it, baby! (Or it’s being archived in a “private collection”. Awwwwww yeah.) But srsly, I have to admit that I’m struck by the lurid fascination of watching a mix of cam-whores, douches and weirdos making fools of themselves. And of course, the promise of endless wang is ever so tempting. The folks at College Humor helpfully created this graphic to better illustrate the Chatroulette penis probability factor:

chatroulette penis chart Wheel of Fortune
In this case, a “dick” does not equal a jerk. But speaking of “jerking” …

Like any true web fad, Chatroulette has grown immensely popular in a very short period of time – and is already attracting its fair share of controversy. The site was launched last November by a high-school student in Moscow, and in 5 short months it has already attracted 500,000 daily visitors worldwide. But as soon as news outlets began carrying the story, it came under criticism for being potentially dangerous, particularly for young chatters. I even came across a Chatroulette screenshot where someone had managed to manipulate their cam feed with a loop of the Jonas Brothers, which caused their young, female chat partners to erupt into squeegasms. As noted by Switched, all it would take is one devious chatter managing to lure a 12 year old girl into flashing her prepubescent chest (or worse) for a lawsuit to begin raging. Sure, the site states that users must be 16 years of age or older (shouldn’t that be 18?!) but there’s no age check or verification to speak of. And yes, websites like Yahoo Chat have long provided online meeting spots for the mentally depraved and curiously naive. But the webcam angle takes things to a whole new level of sketchiness, in my opinion.

So, my web savvy readers, have you tried Chatroulette? I’d love to hear some personal (mis)adventures. And for those who have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about, check out this short Chatroulette movie on YouTube for a little look-see at the way it’s used and abused. Oh, and remember that thing I said about endless penis shots? The makers of the documentary said that during the process of filming, they saw more than one hundred shots of male genitalia, versus only two that belonged to the ladies. Don’t say I didn’t warn you! ^_^

{ 41 comments }

When someone uses the word “feminist” to describe themselves, I often wince a little internally, as the word seems to have a wide range of intensities depending upon who you’re talking to. Using the most basic definition of the word, feminism is “the belief that women and men should have equal social, economic, sexual, and political rights”. Or to break it down even more simply, it’s the idea that chicks and dudes should be considered equals. In that respect, I think that most of us (men and women alike) could be considered feminists. Outside of some cheeky banter about how women should be in the kitchen makin’ sammiches, most folks – at least those in/around my generation – would agree that old social structures are pretty much dead, and we should all be on equal social and economic footing.

But there are some who take feminism to a rather radical and fiery place, and while I appreciate their passion, I just can’t get on board with righteous indignation. There will always be some form of “objectifying women” out there (most often in the media), but women shouldn’t act so pure and innocent – we do it as well. Visit any Vegas-area “all male revue” and you’ll see exactly what I mean.

Don’t ask me how I know that … shy Im a Geeky Girl, in a Barbie World

However, I have to admit that the righteously feminine lady-beast buried deep within my breast was a little conflicted when I saw the newest Barbie, which debuted at the 2010 Toy Fair:

computer engineer barbie Im a Geeky Girl, in a Barbie World
Does this laptop make my ass look big?

Meet Computer Engineer Barbie, Mattel’s attempt at being culturally relevant – although the credit/blame isn’t all theirs. Apparently they conducted an online vote for Barbie’s newest profession, and interestingly enough, women voters actually preferred news anchor as the career choice, while men threw their votes behind computer engineering. Both dolls will be on the shelves this fall, but the one above is getting all the media attention, with most calling it a positive advancement. But I’m curious as to what the consensus is amongst women who are actually part of the nerdy niche they’re trying to appeal to.

I have to admit that I’ve always had issues with Barbie dolls, dating back to being 4 or 5 years old and being blinded by a wall of Barbie blond in the toy store, when all I wanted was a redheaded doll that looked more like me. I know there have been “friends and family” in the Mattel collection with other hair colors and ethnicities, and there have been some failed experiments at giving her different looks over the years. I can appreciate that the “golden standard” (as it were) has become what little girls expect when they ask for a Barbie doll. But the bland lack of diversity bothers me – and it gets even worse when Mattel tries to cram her into every mold possible.

Barbie has had well over 100 careers by now, from being a doctor to a rock star. And inevitably, she’s always rocking the perfect blond hair, glassy-eyed smile, and humanly impossible body proportions. But it struck a nerve when I saw Mattel’s interpretation of what a “computer engineer” (read: geek) would look like. They claim to have worked with the Society of Women Engineers to create “as realistic an ensemble as possible”, and I understand that they want to appeal to the pink and pastel lovin’ demographic, but c’mon! Pink glasses and wristwatch; a t-shirt and jacket covered in binary code and circuitry; skin-tight, sparkly black pants; a Bluetooth in her ear and laptop that’s literally attached to her arm? *Facepalm* Is anyone else experiencing a deja vu to Reese Witherspoon in Legally Blonde?

Here’s the thing … What I love best about geeky women is that they DO NOT fit a mold. While a news anchor or doctor might be expected to look a certain way and dress specifically for their profession, there are a far too broad range of nerds n’ geeks n’ gamers out there to be able to lump us all into a certain style or mentality. It’s cool that Mattel is finally recognizing a career that they’ve completely ignored for the last 30 years, but if Computer Engineering Barbie is their idea of an accurate representation, I think it fails pretty hardcore.

So what do you think, geeky gals? Is it a laughable attempt at gettin’ with the times, or a positive step toward encouraging the youngins to look at computer sciences as a career choice? Oh and just for the hell of it, I found this picture from Forbes that demonstrates what Barbie’s proportions would look like if she was in human form. (Real gal on the left, Barbie-ized version on the right.) Talk about someone who needs to run to the kitchen for a sandwich, stat!

barbie proportions Im a Geeky Girl, in a Barbie World

{ 46 comments }