Ahh, Look at All the Lonely People …

by Scarlett on January 13, 2010 · View Comments

in: Geek Love

Happy (belated) new year, everyone! I can hardly believe that half of January has whisked by already. My days have been filled up with moving preparations and the act thereof, and now I’m happily settled into my new apartment which is literally a stone’s throw from the last. (I stayed in the same complex, just went with a smaller unit to save some much-needed cashola.) With the economy looking to be grim as ever in the first year of the newly minted decade, I’ve been searching my noggin for ideas on how to bring in a little extra for ye olde piggy bank. If you’ve any suggestions, let me know! Just keep ‘em clean – street walking is hardly as glamorous as Julia Roberts and Richard Gere would have us believe. Not that I would know or anything.

Do you like me?

Speaking of looking for lust in all the wrong places, some of you may have heard about the hullabaloo over an online dating website’s recent decision to dump 5000+ members because they “let themselves go” over the holidays. Nothing like some superficial rejection to ring in the new year, amirite? The Beautiful People dating site, which goes out of its way to market itself as an exclusive community with a “strict ban on ugly people”, decided that a number of its members were no longer worthy enough to suck in the rarefied interwebz air of its elite ranks, after said members updated their profiles with post-holiday pictures showing apparent weight gain.

In order to gain access to this mecca of superficial snobbery, you have to upload a photo with your sign-up form, and current members are given 48 hours to rate your image to determine whether or not you are indeed beautiful enough to gain full membership to the site. And the verbiage during the sign-up process even goes so far as to guarantee that your dates will always be beautiful. O RLY? First of all, how does this website check the validity of the photos? It’s ridiculously simple to find pictures of attractive people online – just take a casual stroll through photo albums on Flickr, Facebook, Deviant Art, and similar sites, select one that isn’t too posed and could pass for something candid, and you’re good to go.

Secondly, how can you possibly market an international website that makes claims that its members are all incredibly attractive? By whose measuring stick? The site operates in 10 different languages and has members from all over the world – a world where standards of beauty tend to vary widely. Though unsurprisingly, the highest numbers of member casualties came from the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada – suggesting that those three countries likely make up the bulk of membership. In that case, one can get a pretty fair representative idea of what the standards of so-called “beauty” are amongst the majority of members. Rail thin (yet buxom) women of the bland American model/actress variety, and men with perfect six packs and perma-tans, still glassy-eyed from their last frat party. Ugh.

Now there are some who might argue that plenty of “exclusive dating communities” already exist, and indeed, they do. You have sites aimed at those of certain religious faiths, ethnicities, income levels, etc. However, those sites tend to be pretty objective. If you practice the Jewish faith, you qualify for a Jewish dating site. If you’re Latino, you don’t need to be “voted in” by other Latinos. But beauty, to borrow a very cliched phrase, truly IS in the eye of the beholder. And honestly, how desperate for acceptance must you be to let your photo be paraded out in front of a group of Certified Beautiful People to see if you’re worthy of being including in their hallowed halls?

It’s stuff like this that people will point to – those skeptics who insist on thinking of online dating as unsavory and a waste of time. But I’ve been a champion of being open-minded about meeting people online since dinosaurs roamed the earth (i.e., 1999). I suppose I have positive influences though; my mom met my step-dad less than 2 weeks after she got online for the first time in her life. Still, for those of you who may have considered trying online dating in the new year, don’t let the Beautiful People rejects and their holler-than-thou brethren scare you off. There are still several quality, non-judgmental dating sites out there – OKCupid, Match.com, and eHarmony are just a few. I do wish there was something more geared toward folks of the geeky/nerdy variety, and I’ve seen a site or two that purports to cater to that niche, but they were unimpressive at best. Maybe I’ll start one myself, eh? I could even outlaw profile pictures altogether and find other creative ways to pre-select prospective members:

Did you enjoy the Star Wars prequels?
What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
Who’s hotter – Xena or Sydney Bristow?

Best. Idea. Ever!

“All the lonely people,
Where do they all belong?”
{The Beatles – Eleanor Rigby}

  • michellegalo

    Awesome, and you could allow members to search other members by their answers to similar questions! Kirk, Picard, Sisco or Janeway? Marvel or DC? Favorite independent webcomic, animation company, or small press? Favorite console? PC or Mac? FPS or RPG? You should totally do it, Scarlett. What were you saying about the ol' piggy bank, again?

  • Coldguy

    I think you need to make that dating site “A site where your personality is more important then your looks.”

  • xSmootx

    Shallowness garbage in, shallowness garbage out. Doesn't shock me that there's practically a dating site for every sort of genre of people out there let alone one that judges you if you're pretty or not. Though to those who did sign up and unexpectedly got the boot, it may be a shock to them, their ego, and feelings. If anything, it's just another “let's dangle the carrot in front of people and see if they take the bait” strategy ploy type of marketing that sucker people in with selling points like “Everyone is beautiful here, No uglys allowed!”. Like I said, not all that surprising.

    Also, check your inbox on the Spoony forums about money

    Also also, meh on the new commenting structure.

  • http://twitter.com/riathepinkie Kayla Moore

    Sydney Bristow hands down…and yeah sites like that one need to wither into internet obscurity fast.

  • Dehietyi

    God I so want to find a human version of the Golgotha from Dogma and send it in to them.

  • inamidato

    You are so right. I remember I entered in social network after being suggested by a friend of mine and soon I realized that people was voted just according to the look on the profile picture. If these people judge others just by the picture (that also could be fake), then they are superficial. I left that website after just a few weeks.

    By the way, the Star Wars prequels were a big disappointment (except for a few moments in the third movie).

  • the_z

    I'm personally laughing at those goddamn bigots.

  • http://shadoestar.tumblr.com/ JeffGilbert

    Shallowness issues notwithstanding, there one fundamental problem with things like the Beautiful People dating site. As the saying goes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Physical attractiveness is a very subjective term. there is no textbook definition of what is and isn't attractive. No matter what you look like, some people will find you a major turnoff while others will want to immediately throw you on the bed and have sex with you.

    One example I could use is Paris Hilton. She's someone who became this major sex symbol. Personally, I've always thought she resembled an anorexic drag queen. she does absolutely nothing for me physically (Her personality is a major turnoff as well), but there are obviously people who feel otherwise.

    During one particularly low moment in my love life, I actually resorted to looking through the “women-seeking-men” section in the local paper (Yeah, I know. It's something I'm not proud of). A lot of these ads said that they were looking for someone “attractive.” Okay, in what way? What constitutes “attractive?” Do I fit those particular requirements? Suffice to say, that particular part of my “Looking for love in the wrong places” phase didn't last long.

    In any case, I'm sure that there are people out there who would find those Beautiful People rejects pretty hot.

    Oh, and Sydney Bristow.

  • coeri

    In Holland we have a dating website for higher educated people…. I don't know if that is discriminating or not.

  • Biscuit

    That is just disgusting.
    I've only slightly heard of the site, but bleh!
    On a side note… I don't like the idea of dating sites, I think they're too _staged_ and _desperate_. Like “Your only choice is who is on here”.
    I met my love playing an only game that I enjoyed quite a bit 4 years ago =). There are plenty of people NOT on dating sites.
    I'm not knocking the idea of a dating site, but I'm more for people finding each other unexpectedly. Those that come about when you least expect it (as mine did) are the best kind of love <3

    That's just my opinion of course =D

  • pomexar

    Now, those are some nice questions, specially the second one. :)

  • reika10

    Wow dating sites are actually getting rid of “ugly” people on their sites? O_o how awful….I don't think I'd ever try one of those, they might end well sometimes, but as far as i know they don't. We're all superficial in our own way, but we all like different things. lol Like nerds, nerds are cute :3 and a typical cheerleader in my school wouldn't even considered to give one passing glance. Silly girls. I'm going to have a happy life with an amazing person i can relate too, while they have a gym obsessed yuppie who'll care more about his muscle strength than his wife and family.

  • http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/ Vaughn On Movies

    Hey Scarlett! I was starting to wonder if you were ever going to post again. Are rumors true that there is a fem-Spoony video soon to hit the web? Would this be your screen debut?

    I was and I think still am a member of BeautifulPeople.Net. I signed up a little over a year ago after I heard about it on the local news. I submitted photos of myself, and was approved with a 98% rating—pretty good for a Daywalker (someone who could hang with jocks and nerds alike in high school). For the first couple of weeks I was allowed to browse other profiles AND send messages. There were TWO problems.

    1) The site wasn't Mac friendly. In fact it was the worst site I'd ever seen for a Mac user. It was completely unusable. So I had to use my '04 Compaq to surf it, and that got old.

    2) The member fee. I don't like paying for anything that I don't have to. If there were a ton of attractive girls in my area, then maybe I'd be game, but we are looking at Kansas. There were maybe 12 people from my state in the system who weren't posting photos of someone else.

    Once the trial expired I was no longer allowed to contact users, not a big deal at all. A month or so ago, I received an email stating that the site was revamped (ie Mac friendly) and made free to approved members. I think I'll check it out again, but yeah like you said it's mostly all about people pretending to be someone else.
    I feel that the site has intentions to solve a problem that many beautiful people have, and that problem is that it’s not easy finding one another. Attractive couples come to be because they share common interests. Being attractive in this day and age does make one a minority, and one of the few whom it is still socially acceptable to chastise. Is it the fault of these individuals for not succumbing to fast food and laziness? Should they be ashamed of their own faces? If you want to call these people shallow then you should do the same when you see a romance blossom between fellow humans possessing birth defects.

    At this state in my life I have tremendous talent with no finances or connections; I think I'll be more at home joining a site that specializes in fixing up sugar mommas with arm candy.

    And since this is the Interweb, I know what's coming to me: let the flaming begin!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Haha! I love it. Now if only I knew a lick of relevant coding. HTML and CSS? No sweat! PHP and ASP have me crawling under rocks of shame. =)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Good call. I actually like the idea of a dating site where you're not permitted to post pictures at all. If you want to share them once communication gets going, that's up to you – but otherwise, photos on profiles are banned. Revolutionary!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Meh on your face! =P

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    WIN! Sydney could derail my secret black ops mission *any* day. ::nodnod::

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Well said, Jeff. A lot of women resort to the tried-and-true “tall, dark and handsome” descriptor when they're talking about men they're attracted to. I have to wonder where that comes from – it immediately makes me think of old James Bond films or similar. Personality is so much more valuable than looks in the long run. Physical attraction can blossom between two people over time (anyone who's ever developed a crush on a friend can attest to that) but complimentary personalities are the glue that holds a relationship together, I think.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Mmm, probably not. It's like those sites geared toward matching people with the same religious beliefs – if you're Christian, you're Christian. If you're college-educated, you're college-educated. It might be exclusionary, but it's based on fact rather than subjective opinion at least.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    The good thing about dating sites is that people who sign up are (usually) there for the purpose of finding romance. They're certainly not the *only* places to find love online, but you'd likely have better chances on a designated dating site rather than hoping to stumble across someone on an MMOG, forum, or similar. Not to mention, some people tend to misrepresent themselves a lot more when they're not constrained to profile questions and stats. Games like WoW or programs like Second Life make it easy to disguise yourself as a different sex or give yourself a completely different personality. At least if you're registered for a dating site, the intention to actually meet someone in person is there, which I think encourages people to be more forthcoming and honest. Not always, but it can be a good preliminary buffer against getting burned by someone you meet randomly online.

    There was a really fascinating documentary called TalHotBlond about this very thing. A mother used pictures of her daughter to misrepresent herself in chatrooms and online forums, and ended up inciting a man to commit murder. Scary stuff!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    It's really different strokes for different folks. My mom met my step-dad through the old “random buddy” feature on AIM (he messaged her out of the blue and they talked for hours!) My luck was quite different, and I ended up getting burned by dishonesty a number of times. I still say that the internet is an amazing way to meet likeminded people and make new friends though. Especially for folks like myself who are self-employed and have tended to move around a lot!

  • http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/ Vaughn On Movies

    My comment was flagged quite efficiently.

  • http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/ Vaughn On Movies

    Can I at least get an explanation for being blacklisted? I didn't say anything rude. This is just further proof of the German-Chinese-Inuit conspiracy against me.

  • Reika

    well that's true….i'm on maybe it's just me putting walls up because of a previous relationship. if you'd call it that XD

  • Phynch

    no
    african or europen?
    xena

    now find me someone woman!!!

  • pushinguproses

    Ugh, that article depressed me. And you right, people should let this site drag them down. I met a lot of wonderful people on the internet, and some through dating sites, (okcupid.com).

  • Troy aka Bushido

    I guess I don't qualify as being geeky enough. My answers were:

    -Yes I did, actually. I guess awesome fight scenes CAN make up for shitty acting.
    -No idea, but it's probably not faster than a speeding bullet.
    -Sydney Bristow, hands DOWN! Nobody can mix cute and 'hawt' like she can….other than *ahem* someone else everyone knows.

  • coeri

    True, but still: I don't like the fact that dating sites are splitting “higher educated” from “lower educated”. Since we all have equal rights n stuff. On the other hand: Since the education system is a lot better here than in America, there aren't very much “lower educated” people who could actually go to university; they're not seperating rich from poor.

  • http://twitter.com/Torn0023 Thilo Wiedamann

    That was exactly what i needed today.
    Thank you Scarlett.
    Thank you so very much.

    PS: HELL NO!!
    What kind of swallow are we talking about african or european?
    Xena of course! AHLALALALALLAL

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Dude, Sydney is way hotter than Xena – although she lose some points where the lack of height is concerned. But I shall accept 2 out 3 questions answered correctly! ;-)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    OKCupid was a fun site, IIRC. It seems to attract more folks of the nerdy persuasion than the other sites, which is always a huge bonus!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    GTFO!!!

    … Well okay, you nailed #3 at least. Your membership will be pending until further notice. ;-)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Okay, Xena gets hawt props for having long legs like another girl I know (wink-wink) but Sydney was a spy and stuff! No comparison. =)

  • HarmlessScarab

    let me try!!!
    1. No
    2. European or African?
    3. Sydney Bristow!

    (I totally didn't look at any body's previeous comments…)

  • googeler

    xena of course, she had a remote controlled boomerang that was directed by “hya-lalallalalalal” waves.

  • Fishnets

    1. No
    2. African or European?
    3. Sydney Bristow, naturally (cos Jennifer Garner is hot y'all and so sweet and kooky in interviews which gets her major points) Though I do love Xena too, love that show extra special.

  • kefkaesque

    1) No, but if you skip over any scene with Jar Jar and whenever Anakin (in either form) opens his mouth, it becomes tolerable.
    2) African or European?
    3) Trick question. The answer is Sydney Bristow with Xena's outfit and a chakram.

  • MFlorian

    There's nothing wrong with short women. =P

  • MFlorian

    1. Yes.
    2. African or European?
    3. Sydney Bristow. I guess. o.O

    And I'm not very impressed with dating sites. Like you wrote, it's incredibly easy to lie on those things. A Nerd/Geek site would require you to demonstrate some basic knowledge in any number of categories.

    “If it doesn't combine to form Voltron, I'm going to be a tough sale.”
    “I am the blind date who says 'Ni'. 'Ni!'”
    “I got 8 Gigabytes of RAM, baby.”

    ………………………………..on second thought, maybe that's not such a great idea. o.o;;;

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    No, but tall ones are teh roolz!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Win! You get instant lifetime membership. ;-)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    My readers are teh smartest in all teh interwebz!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Dayuuuuum. I want to say they had Sydney dress as Leia at one point, but Ms Bristow in Xena gear? Yes please!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Easy to lie, certainly, but I'll never understand those who do. Assuming that you sign up for a dating site with the sincere purpose of finding someone awesome to share a romance with, why would you want to kick off your potential relationship with false information? I think the worst offense is usually outdated or misleading pictures. I've been victim of those before, and it's beyond awkward when you realize you're trapped at dinner or a movie with someone who looks much different than they led you to believe. *Shudder*

  • MFlorian

    Why? If they're earnest, maybe they feel insecure. Maybe they irrationally think that if even if they deceive someone into showing up, once that person gets to know them, they'll realize what a beautiful, unique snowflake…

    Or they're just sociopaths. Seriously. They're everywhere online and it's just heartbreaking.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    “But you totally wanted me before you realized that I resemble an ape that's been beaten with the ugly stick!” ;-)

    People just need to own up and be honest, period. Though I still think a dating site that banishes pictures would be kick-ass. Probably would never work though.

  • http://www.facebook.com/reptyle216 Brad Johnson

    That place sounds like the “dating” sites for gay men; I used quotes because they tend to be more about hooking up than getting to know someone. Every now and then I'll come across a guy who wants to chat because he saw that I'm into gaming and comics, but most of the time I just get “You're hot, wanna fuck?”, and in many cases the guy in question is twice my age or older. Ew no thanks.

    With that said, I think OKCupid works just fine if you want to find someone nerdy. The match percentage system works great if you answer like 1,200 questions…which I did…but I've come across several interesting guys in the 80-90% range. The highest I found was 96 and I really would have liked him, but sadly he wasn't that into me. I'm currently seeing a guy from there and I think he scored in the low 80's. But then again, I'm jealous that you've got Spoony lol.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josh-Reszke/100000577646591 Josh Reszke

    I'm shocked to hear about a dating site that only lets people they consider attractive in. I know dating sites tend to be like virtual bars, but this one sounds like a virtual Studio 54. I think online dating sites are great if you're looking more for having fun than finding a spouse or life partner. Most of the married people I know just happened to meet that person one day. They weren't out there searching constantly. So I think it's more about meeting that right person not finding them. Many people on these sites are trying to rush things and may not be willing to accept that the time they meet that special someone is beyond their control.

  • SethTheXenocide

    “Did you enjoy the Star Wars Prequels?”
    -No. I literally fell asleep during Attack of the Clones, and while the fight scenes in Revenge of the Sith were better than the previous prequels, it was still a rock stupid story, ending, and bad acting.

    “What is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?”
    -The air speed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is 24 miles per hour. No, seriously. Someone mathematically found it out using the Strouhal Number in Cruising Flight.

    “Who's hotter – Xena or Sydney Bristow?”
    -Sydney Bristow, even if just for the fact that if we got into an argument she COULDN'T kick my ass. Xena would have a fair shot at it.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    I think we've got our charter member right here! =)

  • SethTheXenocide

    Heck yeah. You can use me as your posterboy. I just advise that, if you do, don't use the photo of me dressed as William Faulkner for a costume party. I think that level geekness is scary even to the majority of hardcore geeks.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    You drive a hard bargain, but I think I can work with you. Hehe.

blog comments powered by Disqus