For all of the deliciously feminine traits I have in spades, being a fan of “chick flick” fodder is generally not one of them. Oh, there are exceptions to every rule, of course. For example, I am an unabashed fan of the film Ever After (yes, the Cinderella retelling with Drew Barrymore as its heroine), and films like Shakespeare In Love and Sliding Doors have been known to make me swoon. But the last several years have seen quite an unfortunate trend in female-oriented cinema, with foolish premises and frustrating archetypes abounding. And as I grow ever more worldly and wise over time, I have much less patience for the tired story lines (always the bridesmaid, never the bride; girl overcomes trials and tragedy to get the guy of her dreams; etc etc). Perhaps that’s why the premise of Eat, Pray, Love intrigued me so, and indeed, the book came to me at a rather opportune moment in my life.

I was adrift in the Portland airport at the culmination of a disastrous vacation which found me stranded in an unfamiliar locale, all by my lonesome. After 3 days of trudging about the rain-soaked city, I was exhausted and rather finished with unreliable hotels, unreliable rental cars, and most of all, unreliable men. I arrived hours early for my flight home, and needing some distraction I found myself in the bookstore, gazing at a mountainous display of Elizabeth Gilbert’s tome, which had recently been touted as Oprah’s “book of the year” or similar. I usually take Ms. Winfrey’s literary recommendations with a grain of salt, often finding them too preachy or sentimental for my tastes. But curiosity got the best of me, so I purchased a copy and settled myself in a deserted area of the concourse for a good, long read.

To sum up, EPL is a memoir of a woman in her early thirties who has a seemingly ideal life – the big house, the loving husband, the successful career – but feels trapped and dissatisfied nonetheless. So through a series of fortuitous events, she embarks upon a year long “journey of self-discovery” through Italy, India, and Indonesia. Is it indulgent and trite at times? Absolutely. But it fascinated me with its ideas of nonconformity. Here was a woman who had walked the “make no waves, be everything for everyone” path, and got well and truly fed up with it. So she did something completely selfishly-oriented – hedonistic, even – and came out the other end feeling lighter, happier, and marvelously fulfilled. That’s one personal journey I can certainly admire.

For all its admirers though, the book – and now the film – have aroused a great deal of dissent. Of the film, I won’t go into reviewing it other than to say that it was an acceptable adaptation, though a great deal was omitted and some serious liberties were taken. But of the author’s story, I can see why it rankles some people. Gilbert has become something of a hero to scores of seemingly content women who were, in fact, rather unfulfilled with their lots in life. She made the idea of not wanting marriage or children far less taboo, and encouraged the practice of putting the self at the front and center of one’s life. But how many of her readers were really in a position in their lives to take advantage of such “radical thinking”? It wasn’t all smooth sailing though; the author even detailed the laborious and excruciating task of ending her marriage – and watching my own parents’ struggle with obtaining a divorce in the same state, I can attest to how difficult New York law makes that process. But she was still fairly young in years, childless, and a moderately well-off writer with the luxury of being able to obtain a monetary advance from her publisher that paid for her year of enlightenment. As such, many felt that to inspire discontent in women who were far less able to make dramatic life changes was unfair. Still, isn’t the hallmark of a moving piece of work (be it art, film, music, etc) its ability to stir up emotions or new ways of looking at life – no matter the potentially controversial consequence?

Though it had been sometime since I’d read the book, seeing Eat, Pray, Love at the theater reminded me of what I had enjoyed about its premise. Strip away the frequent narcissism and meandering style, and Gilbert’s journey was rather revelatory. Sure, she was hardly the first and certainly won’t be the last author suggest the idea of spiritual egoism (Ayn Rand’s philosophy comes to mind), but she also spoke frankly about finding freedom from depression and dependency in a way that was refreshing. Even moreso, the notion that women don’t need to follow in their mother’s footsteps or fulfill some societal tradition or ideal in order to have meaningful lives. In fact, the exact opposite can be the pathway to happiness for some.

My friend S paid me a lovely compliment recently; he said I was one of the most secure women he’d ever known. “You don’t invite people into your life because you need rescuing, or because you need them to fill some specific role. You’re secure, individual, independent.” And those traits are what drive me, more now than ever before. To once more revisit the theme of EPL, feed yourself – literally and figuratively – with the things that fulfill you, that bring joy and pleasure into your life. Explore what fascinates you, philosophically and spiritually, and celebrate the ideas that make you feel connected (even if they don’t quite jive with what others expect of you). And above all else, appreciate that soul inside you – the essence that makes you YOU. We’re like rare and complex recipes, made up of unique spices and experiences that can never quite be duplicated. Life is fleeting; enjoy it while it lasts. Even if it’s a chick flick, an indulgent memoir, a year spent tripping around the continents on a spiritual quest. Or as the Italians so poetically advise: il dolce far niente. “The sweetness of doing nothing.” What could be more soul-satisfying than that?

{ 21 comments }

I went to see Inception the other night, and while it was a visually stunning film, the plot was as layered and tangled as my thoughts have been of late. Fascinating, but confusing. Prone to wild variations in interpretation, and difficult to sort out. I genuinely wanted to like it, but I have a built-in resistance to films that encourage, or even require, secondary viewings. To me, movie-going has always been about entertainment. Whether to be moved emotionally with a drama; feeling uplifted and full of laughter from a comedy; a tugging of the heart-strings from a romance; the thrilling swell of excitement inspired by an action-adventure … I just enjoy the feeling of being transported, forgetting my own cares and concerns for a spell, and coming out the other end having been entertained. With Inception, I left the theater feeling almost unintelligent and discouraged with myself, wondering if maybe I’d not opened my mind enough to what was happening on screen. Perhaps other pervasive thoughts had kept me from being totally enraptured with the film, because surely if a movie (even with its heady, mind-bending premise) had been so well received, I must be a lesser-than moviegoer to have not understood it completely.

The mood stayed with me quite some time, and it wasn’t until a few days later that I found a few others with similar views, particularly Owen Gleiberman from Entertainment Weekly. I related completely when he said that he found the film difficult to review, because “how can you clarify, and justify, your feelings in precise language when those feelings are haziness, confusion, befuddlement, and a vague sense of missed connections?” Amen, Sir Owen. And in my case, Inception seems to have brought to the surface the feelings of haziness and disconnection I’ve been feeling in general lately. Those tricky harbingers of doubt, haunting my mind like misty apparitions – leaving vague impressions that something is missing in my life, but leaving behind no fingerprints or DNA evidence that I can present to the court. I told my friend E that I feel a bit like I’m at the center of a labyrinthine maze, surrounded by endless pathways but no compass to guide me or totem to ground me. It’s not a helpless feeling at all; there’s a certain thrill in feeling like you’re surrounded by possibilities. But every journey begins with a single step, and I feel a bit like I’m standing in molasses.

Another thing that Inception reminded me of were my own thoughts about dreaming. For as long as I can remember, I’ve been easily affected by the pictures conjured on the canvas of my slumbering mind. Most notably was a dream I had when I was 18, in which my home was on fire and I only had time to save two items from my bedroom. I selected my book bag (where I kept all my college materials, as well as my wallet) and my box of receipts (at that age, for some unknown reason, I was a voracious receipt-keeper). I remember waking from the dream and thinking that it was an odd one – not for the subject, but more for the details left out. How did the fire start? What happened in the aftermath? … Sadly, I didn’t have to wait long for answers, as about two weeks later, a candle ignited its holder in my bedroom and set my dressing table ablaze, its flames licking around my room in what felt like an instant. In the end, about 75% of our home was destroyed, and my room was completely gutted. But guess which two items I had the wherewithal to save?

I had trouble sleeping for months to come, torturing myself with questions like Are dreams actually prophetic? or Did my subconscious mind latch onto the dream and cause its real-life manifestation? I still haven’t sorted that one out completely, but after spending the last two or three years slowly immersing myself in modern philosophy and metaphysics, I’ve realized that it doesn’t matter. Just as I don’t really have the motivation to dissect and analyze Inception, at some point we have to observe the mysteries of life and be able to say “I don’t know the answers” without letting our natural need-to-know tendencies overwhelm us. So these days, my dreams have simply become fascinating curiosities. Maybe that also helps to explain my issues with Inception. The idea that someone can utilize your dreams to harm or manipulate you just doesn’t seem plausible. Not that I’d kick Tom Hardy or Cillian Murphy out of my dreams, mind you. But that’s a wholllllle different type of dreaming. ;)

Sometimes though, a dream is worth keeping around to remind you of something, like a token in your pocket or a picture of a long-ago memory. There’s one, only a few months old now, that I’ve been carrying close to my heart, and while its edges are beginning to fray, I can’t help folding and unfolding it from time to time. In this dream was a house, a home crafted of an assortment of random and wonderful materials that gave it a vibrantly unique look that could never be duplicated. Inside were dozens of rooms, each with its own flavor. One held a gleaming grand piano; another was filled with a dreamy assortment of books; there was a room full of vintage 1940′s pin-up art; yet another that looked like the coziest Internet cafe you could ever imagine. And there were people there, all happily engrossed in the rooms and activities of their choice, but no recognizable faces – more mirages or imprints than flesh and bone. But I was nowhere to be found, despite having a tremendous feeling of belonging to this place. I peeked and poked and tried to figure out where I had been or belonged, where it was that I fit into this scene.

Then after a while I realized … I was the house.

And it all made perfect sense … The different rooms represented the facets of my personality, and the mirages were memories and impressions made by people and life experiences. But the house stood alone in its own little slice of reality and edge of the world. It didn’t need neighbors and subdivisions to keep it company, but it also didn’t need locks or security alarms. Open to the public but its own private island. In the world and of the world.

So maybe that’s where I am at the moment … Observing the rooms and passageways within, trying to decide where to recline for a while, or what room to build next. Having my own moment of inception, if you will – standing at the beginning, the origin point of something greater. Interestingly enough, one of my very favorite words is denouement, a gorgeously-pronounced French word meaning the resolution or outcome of a complex series of events. But maybe I’ll grow to love inception as well – if not so much the movie, at least the idea.

Hmmm … Perhaps Christopher Nolan achieved his goal after all.

{ 10 comments }