Sustenance, Spirituality, Soul

by Scarlett on August 20, 2010 · View Comments

in: Scarlett Under Covers

For all of the deliciously feminine traits I have in spades, being a fan of “chick flick” fodder is generally not one of them. Oh, there are exceptions to every rule, of course. For example, I am an unabashed fan of the film Ever After (yes, the Cinderella retelling with Drew Barrymore as its heroine), and films like Shakespeare In Love and Sliding Doors have been known to make me swoon. But the last several years have seen quite an unfortunate trend in female-oriented cinema, with foolish premises and frustrating archetypes abounding. And as I grow ever more worldly and wise over time, I have much less patience for the tired story lines (always the bridesmaid, never the bride; girl overcomes trials and tragedy to get the guy of her dreams; etc etc). Perhaps that’s why the premise of Eat, Pray, Love intrigued me so, and indeed, the book came to me at a rather opportune moment in my life.

I was adrift in the Portland airport at the culmination of a disastrous vacation which found me stranded in an unfamiliar locale, all by my lonesome. After 3 days of trudging about the rain-soaked city, I was exhausted and rather finished with unreliable hotels, unreliable rental cars, and most of all, unreliable men. I arrived hours early for my flight home, and needing some distraction I found myself in the bookstore, gazing at a mountainous display of Elizabeth Gilbert’s tome, which had recently been touted as Oprah’s “book of the year” or similar. I usually take Ms. Winfrey’s literary recommendations with a grain of salt, often finding them too preachy or sentimental for my tastes. But curiosity got the best of me, so I purchased a copy and settled myself in a deserted area of the concourse for a good, long read.

To sum up, EPL is a memoir of a woman in her early thirties who has a seemingly ideal life – the big house, the loving husband, the successful career – but feels trapped and dissatisfied nonetheless. So through a series of fortuitous events, she embarks upon a year long “journey of self-discovery” through Italy, India, and Indonesia. Is it indulgent and trite at times? Absolutely. But it fascinated me with its ideas of nonconformity. Here was a woman who had walked the “make no waves, be everything for everyone” path, and got well and truly fed up with it. So she did something completely selfishly-oriented – hedonistic, even – and came out the other end feeling lighter, happier, and marvelously fulfilled. That’s one personal journey I can certainly admire.

For all its admirers though, the book – and now the film – have aroused a great deal of dissent. Of the film, I won’t go into reviewing it other than to say that it was an acceptable adaptation, though a great deal was omitted and some serious liberties were taken. But of the author’s story, I can see why it rankles some people. Gilbert has become something of a hero to scores of seemingly content women who were, in fact, rather unfulfilled with their lots in life. She made the idea of not wanting marriage or children far less taboo, and encouraged the practice of putting the self at the front and center of one’s life. But how many of her readers were really in a position in their lives to take advantage of such “radical thinking”? It wasn’t all smooth sailing though; the author even detailed the laborious and excruciating task of ending her marriage – and watching my own parents’ struggle with obtaining a divorce in the same state, I can attest to how difficult New York law makes that process. But she was still fairly young in years, childless, and a moderately well-off writer with the luxury of being able to obtain a monetary advance from her publisher that paid for her year of enlightenment. As such, many felt that to inspire discontent in women who were far less able to make dramatic life changes was unfair. Still, isn’t the hallmark of a moving piece of work (be it art, film, music, etc) its ability to stir up emotions or new ways of looking at life – no matter the potentially controversial consequence?

Though it had been sometime since I’d read the book, seeing Eat, Pray, Love at the theater reminded me of what I had enjoyed about its premise. Strip away the frequent narcissism and meandering style, and Gilbert’s journey was rather revelatory. Sure, she was hardly the first and certainly won’t be the last author suggest the idea of spiritual egoism (Ayn Rand’s philosophy comes to mind), but she also spoke frankly about finding freedom from depression and dependency in a way that was refreshing. Even moreso, the notion that women don’t need to follow in their mother’s footsteps or fulfill some societal tradition or ideal in order to have meaningful lives. In fact, the exact opposite can be the pathway to happiness for some.

My friend S paid me a lovely compliment recently; he said I was one of the most secure women he’d ever known. “You don’t invite people into your life because you need rescuing, or because you need them to fill some specific role. You’re secure, individual, independent.” And those traits are what drive me, more now than ever before. To once more revisit the theme of EPL, feed yourself – literally and figuratively – with the things that fulfill you, that bring joy and pleasure into your life. Explore what fascinates you, philosophically and spiritually, and celebrate the ideas that make you feel connected (even if they don’t quite jive with what others expect of you). And above all else, appreciate that soul inside you – the essence that makes you YOU. We’re like rare and complex recipes, made up of unique spices and experiences that can never quite be duplicated. Life is fleeting; enjoy it while it lasts. Even if it’s a chick flick, an indulgent memoir, a year spent tripping around the continents on a spiritual quest. Or as the Italians so poetically advise: il dolce far niente. “The sweetness of doing nothing.” What could be more soul-satisfying than that?

  • Tenshigure

    The problem I have with the book (and I suppose, the movie) is the fact that the whole thing plays out as a social dichotomy with no balance other than for the author’s self-security and assurance. Details of things like WHY her marriage fell apart or why she wasn’t attempting to find a balance in her state of being were brushed aside for a focus on her insecurities and a desire to seek to find herself. This, compounded with the fact that she ends up in an almost immediate second relationship (that failed quickly, may I add) did further establish that there was a bit of selfishness at the beginning.

    Sure, as things progress there are moments of clarity and attempted change of heart, but even the moments of charity shown all seemed to have this hint of self-satisfaction in the process. There’s nothing wrong with being strong, independent, and secure with yourself, nor taking time to do so; it’s the absence of being able to find this without seemingly stepping on a few heads along the way that underlie the message.

    Maybe it’s the traditionalist in me, who knows…but personally even from a male perspective, I had my own soul-searching quest realized through the responsibilities I inherited through becoming both a husband and a father.

  • http://twitter.com/khakhov Khadeja Merenkov

    I loved reading this, dear Scarlett. I cheer on any artwork, be it books, film, music, etc. that show women who are successful of their own accord; who are able to find peace within themselves. These chick flicks about ladies who need a man to get the happy ending are no longer fulfilling. Conforming rarely ever leads to happiness. <3

  • Anonymous

    “Do not dance like no one is watching, dance like everyone is watching and you don’t give a damn.” -Jordan Ferguson

  • http://www.facebook.com/NoctumRaven Erin Kollar

    The premise sounds promising but I probably won’t read it. And I can understand about watching “chick flicks” from time to time. I like very dark and brooding books but something lighthearted from time to time is always good.

  • Anonymous

    When I read it I was at a lousy period in my life, and I found it helpful. But although I’m in a better place due to my at-the-time sudden egoism, I wasn’t able to do it in such a fun and indulgent way. I think that’s what is grating for me about the movie. If only we ALL could find ourselves through a generous book advance!

  • http://twitter.com/VillainIsLemony Caitlin J

    Everytime I read your articles, I smile. I just smile….they bring some sort of light and new perspective into my mind as I read. What you’re trying to say is always clear, and you’re definately the kind of person who others can look upto and admire. I’ll look into the book as I could use a pick-me-up for direction in life and solidifying happiness as the number one thing. Thank you, Scarlett.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    But aren’t most memoirs rather imbalanced and self-indulgent at their core? As for some of the glaringly omitted details, you’re right – they could have cast things in a much different light. I actually saw Elizabeth Gilbert speak at an event back in 2008, and she mentioned that she kept as many details about her ex-husband private as she could out of respect. From what I understand though, he’s supposedly publishing his own “tell-all memoir” soon. Knowing the other side of the story might be fascinating, though I’m sure he has no motivation to be anything less than biased

    I think your “traditionalist” qualities and values are going to naturally rub up against the premise of this book, and I totally understand that. As I said, I can completely understand why Gilbert’s journey rankles some people, as it really is selfishly-oriented. But I have an appreciation for that kind of thing. It’s preferable if you can have your soul-searching quest without hurting other people in the process, of course, but if you’re always worried about the views and feelings of others, you’re not really looking out for number one.

    I’ll admit, I kind of respect that she wasn’t afraid in the context of her story to come across as immature, irresponsible, and selfish. Because in the end, she emerged a happier person. Isn’t that all that really matters?

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Beautifully said, Miss Khadeja! Being a strong, independent woman is still such a revolutionary idea – when really it should be the norm. If everyone looked out for themselves, we might be a far less “community-oriented” society, but imagine the things that people could accomplish. Self-fulfillment is where it’s at! :)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    I think it appeals most to women who are either unsatisfied with life in some way or another, or those who’ve had similar “spiritual/personal journeys” who feel reinforced by what the author experienced. If you don’t fall into those two camps, you’d probably find it very self-indulgent. But dark and brooding books can be very thought-provoking too!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Your words echo my thoughts exactly! Though I greatly admired her moxie and fortune, it grated on my nerves that it all came together so seemingly easily. When I saw the author speak at an event, she emphasized that one doesn’t need to go to fancy countries and have exotic experiences to be “enlightened” – but I don’t think that was made clear in the book, which is a shame.

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Awww, thank you lovely lady! I hope you enjoy the book; there are others that aren’t quite so lofty, like “The Happiness Project” and “Helping Me Help Myself”, but they’re just not as good as EPL. The book (and moreso, the film) has its issues, but it makes me feel hopeful and happy about nonconformity and not trying to fit into a perfect mold. :)

  • http://twitter.com/Zelda_Queen Lilly Osthoff

    I have not read the books, but I remember when my friend and I saw the trailer (at our viewing of Eclipse, of all places XD). My first thought was “Wow, something that has a woman putting her spiritual wellbeing before a job and relationships. How novel”. I really was a bit surprised and intrigued though, especially after Hollywood has spent so much time churning out stuff like “Bride Wars”. Yeah, I didn’t know it was a book at first. ^^;

  • http://twitter.com/khakhov Khadeja Merenkov

    I think that this idea is not the norm because women were always seen as the care-givers, supporters, and nurturers. I think it’s a beautiful thing, to care for another person, but in the end the people who take care of others end up suffering from leeches – they never have time only for themselves. There needs to be a balance so that everyone can give back as an individual, not JUST as a family member or member of society.

  • http://twitter.com/khakhov Khadeja Merenkov

    I haven’t read the book, but I’d like to ask: in your opinion, does Gilbert show respect and understanding for people of different cultures? I think one thing I heard as a criticism is that she goes to these different countries and she just takes and takes from them without giving back. I am curious about that.

  • Anonymous

    Exactly. I got to do fun things like see if my insurance covered therapy, she got to eat Italian food. :)

  • http://thebag1121.blogspot.com/ GonzoLink

    Wow… I have absolutely no interest in either the book or the movie but you may as well have summed up my entire life’s philosophy in that final paragraph. In my opinion, our purpose in life is to discover what some may refer to as our soul or that essential essence that makes us who we as individuals are. We all have our own destinies that we have to figure out for ourselves and far be it from me to say that everything is predetermined, but we all have something that we can offer everyone else. For some it might be building the Hadron collider and for others it might be restocking Costco and for others still it might be designing and maintaining a website, but everyone contributes in their own unique way. In the past couple of years (this last one in particular) I’ve come to terms with the fact that there are two distinct categories of so-called “selfishness”. The first is what everyone attributes to the term, that is in looking out solely for #1 damned be those who get in your way, and then there’s being conscious of the hardships that affect others yet also conscious of the fact that unless you choose to pursue helping others as your life’s work, in the end there’s really only one person you can ultimately be responsible for. Life is all about finding that harmonious balance of doing good by others, but never neglecting the self either. We don’t have to be alone in this life of ours, but you should also never have to compromise who you truly are just to try and avoid lonliness. Although I’d wager you needn’t worry too much about that last one ;)

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    I found that she was quite respectful in how she depicted people of other cultures, but I’m glad at times she wasn’t so politically-correct; it made it more believable. She actually seemed to be very generous, at one point raising about $18,000 for a woman who befriended her in Bali. So I’m not sure where she gets that bad rap, but I was impressed!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Well said! It’s sad that something like “looking out for number one” is seen as novel, but it really is – especially in today’s dumbed-down chick flick cinema. That her ideas and “selfishness” were considered so radical still kinda rubs me the wrong way, though I can understand it. I look forward to a time when people aren’t seen as being lesser-than because they decide to put themselves first!

  • http://scarlettopia.com Scarlett

    Beautifully said, Gonzo! I think the philosophy you’re describing is known as “rational/ethical egoism” – the idea that we should look out for ourselves while being mindful and respectful of others. The word “selfishness” has such a bad rap, but it really is the only way to live life if you want to be truly fulfilled, I think. You summed it all up perfectly; we are definitely on the same page, my friend! :)

  • Evil Claire

    I’m in my early 30′s. I just recently got out of an abusive relaitonship. I discovered I really didn’t have the first clue about what made me who I am. So I’ve been doing much the same. Self discovery. Trying to figure out why i like somehting or don’t like it. I’m going after the things I want in life now regardless of what other people think. And it’s been rough, but ever so fulfilling.

  • PatrickFoehr

    I’m a thirteen year old boy and i’m definately a hedonist. Life is short and meant to be enjoyed. You should care more about taking a path that you will be truly happy with rather than the one that neccessarily makes you successful. Helping people is important, but you must also be responsible for yourself as well as others. And in making yourself a better person, you can make the world a better place for everyone in it. It’s awesome if you watch out for other people, but you must always remember to take care of yourself as well. I put being happy and making other people able to be happy above all else. And in that way, I can keep selfishness and selflessness from ever out weighing each other. And once you do that, life is smooth sailing for everyone. Got to admit Scarlett, i’m pretty impressed.

blog comments powered by Disqus